One of the aims of Peace Journalism is the early warning of conflicts where current peace-making structures and institutions are inadequate and thus r...

One of the aims of Peace Journalism is the early warning of conflicts where current peace-making structures and institutions are inadequate and thus require increased attention and action by peace-makers.
Although Somalia is in a crucial geo-strategic position on the Horn of Africa facing the Arabian peninsula, the country has largely slipped from world attention except for specialists. The government had disappeared in 1991, proving that people can live without a State. What order existed was the result of very local “warlords” and clanic chiefs. For many in the United States, Somalia was recalled as
the location for the film “Black Hawk Down” and the images of a dead US soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu. These were scenes best forgotten, and for many US decision-makers an object lesson as to why one should not get involved in African disputes.
Now, renewed fighting – the sharpest in 15 years – between some of the warlords and a revitalized Islamic movement “the Union of Sharia Courts” projects the picture of a Taliban-type victory which could open a door to Islamic terrorists. The Union is led by Sheik Sharif Ahmed and seems to be gaining the military advantage.
In 1960, the Somali Republic was created by the Union of the British colony and the Italian trusteeship area. Italy had had part of Somalia as a colony until the end of the Second World War. From 1945 to 1950, Somalia was governed by UN administrators. In 1950, it was returned to Italy under a Trusteeship Council mandate. The Somalis speak the same language and practice the same forms of Islam. The divisions among the Somalis are not “tribal” but clanic, with clans, followed by subclans, lineages and extended families. Lineage is the most important identity, thus one has frequent intra-clan tensions as well as inter-clan disputes. It has been said that Somalis lived in societies with rules but without rulers. (See I.M. Lewis’ classic study: A Pastoral Democracy (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1969). There are Somalis also living in Ethiopia and Kenya – a fact which led to Pan-Somali aspirations and a 1977-1978 war with Ethiopia in an effort to annex the Ogaden area where most of Ethiopia’s Somalis live. These Pan-Somali efforts have always failed.
In such a clanic, largely pastoral society, one does not need state institutions to function. Clans are not all equal; some are severely disadvantaged due to their social status and thus their access to water and grazing land. There were, however, people who lived outside the clanic system. There was a small minority on the frontier with Kenya who were agriculturalists and non-Somali. There were also urbanized Somalis, especially those living in the coastal cities who no longer followed clanic authority as well as a small but growing educated bourgeoisie.
The army was the only institution of the state which was not originally structured along clanic lines. After some eight years during which government posts, seats in Parliament and government favours were distributed along clanic lines, in 1969, General Mohamed Siad Barre took control of the government. His ideology was an anti-clanic “scientific socialism”, and he received support from the USSR thus bringing Somalia into the Cold War. The Cold War helped to partition Africa into ideological spheres of influence. In order to counter Soviet influence in Somalia, the USA increased its support for conservative Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia.
Siad Barre with the help of Soviet advisors increased the size of the Army and the paramilitary forces. By 1982 there were some 120,000 men in the army with political commissars to develop ideological purity. Unlike the colonial period and the first years of independence during which the rural areas were left alone, Siad Barre extended government control to the rural areas, weakening clanic chiefs. Siad Barre also largely destroyed the independent bourgeoisie; some were jailed, more left the country to work
elsewhere.
Then, at the time of the 1977-1978 Ogaden war with Ethiopia, there was a classic Cold War switch of alliances. A Marxist, Mengistu Haile Mariam overthrew the Emperor of Ethiopia and looked to the Soviet Union for help. In 1978, Siad Barre abrogated the USSR/Somali Treaty of Friendship and turned to the USA for help with weapons and training of the military. As Barre was uninterested in US liberal-democratic ideology, he returned to governing on a clanic basis with members of the liniages of himself, his mother and his principal son-in-law. His style of government under US influence from 1978 until the end of 1991 ranged from the autocratic to the tyrannical.
With the end of the Cold War, neither the US nor the USSR had much interest in supporting difficult and unpredictable allies. Thus by 1991 both Siad Barre and Mengistu had been forced from power by rebel movements. While Ethiopia was able to re-establish a State structure having a long history of a weak but centralized government, Somalia returned to a pre-colonial structure but with few of the conflict-resolution techniques of pre-colonial times. Thus, in addition to traditional clanic conflicts over water and livestock, there was a clash between traditional clanic leaders and army officers who had gotten a taste of power under Siad Barre and who now wanted to set up little militarized kingdoms over which to rule.
As the 1960 merger of the Italian and British colonies had been more based on a desire of the Europeans to withdraw than any Somali urge to merge, the former British area reorganized itself after 1992 and took back the name Somaliland. The Somaliland area is relatively stable, and in 1993 Somaliland reintroduced the structures of government – tax, customs and banking. Somaliland has trade to Arabia and beyond through the busy port of Berbera and is helped by the remittances from in
Somaliland diaspora in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, in East Africa and some in Europe. However, there is a deep fear among many African governments that if one African state breaks up, many could follow the same pattern. Thus no African government wants to recognize the independent existence of Somaliland and Europeans and others will not go against the African consensus to recognize Somaliland.
Thus, it is in the former Italian area and its capital Mogadishu where there is no established government. The area is divided into many small, separate fiefs under the control of a warlord with fighting over the control of areas between two fiefs. The result is economic and political chaos with most people living a day-to-day existence. Many of the youth have been taken into the forces of the warlords but receive no education and even little military training. There are also independent bandit bands interested in looting.
Since governments do not like anarchy, there have been numerous efforts on the part of neighboring countries to help the Somalis create a government. After many failed efforts, there now exists a “Transitional Federal Government” in the provincial town of Baidoa made up of clan leaders, some warlords and some chosen from urban “civil society”. However, while people do not have much enthusiasm for a continuation of the armed conflicts, there is not much enthusiasm for the return of government either. Attitudes of animosity, suspicion and hostility are dominant, and it is unlikely that the Transitional Government will become a reality.
Into this void, Islamic groups which have always been around are now trying to take the high ground. The al-Ittihad al Islaami (Islamic Unity, often called just al-Ittihad) is a loosely structured group which has taken in floating Islamic fighters, many of whom had been in Afghanistan or Pakistan. They see the similarities between the time after the departure of the Soviets from Afghanistan when the resistance forces were fighting for control among themselves and the chaos in Somalia. They hope that with a Taliban-like ideology of “order” and “Islam will solve all your problems”, the people will help them come to power in order to put an end to the divisions among warlords.
Others, in particular the USA, which has troops in neighboring Djibouti, also see the similarities and fear the rise of a Taliban-type government which might also open the door to Islamists from other countries, the creation of training camps for terrorism, and increased dangers to oil-producing countries.
There is the old saying that “Nature does not like a void”, and we may see countries trying to influence events, much as Pakistan’s military intelligence services largely contributed to the original victory of the Taliban in Afghanistan. The situation merits close attention, and peacemakers must see what can be done so that Somali voices with a wider vision are heard.